1965 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP) has 196 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1580 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | OT | Tahoe |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 4807 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 2260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 98 L |
