1965 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econovan (90 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econovan weights approximately 616 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 2004 Ford Econovan | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | OT | Econovan |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 90 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1296 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2210 mm |
