1965 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | OT | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 3376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 100 L |
