1965 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth OT (64 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 485 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Abarth | Volkswagen |
Model | OT | Polo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 63 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 19.5:1 |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 45 L |