1965 Abarth OT vs. 2006 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 2006 Chevrolet Lumina | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | OT | Lumina |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
