1965 Abarth OT vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Kangoo (74 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | OT | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 52 L |