1965 Abarth OT vs. 2008 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 2008 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 275 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Aveo (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth OT. (81 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 2008 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | OT | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 48 L |
