1965 Abarth OT vs. 2008 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 1725 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 2008 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Abarth | Nissan |
| Model | OT | Rogue |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 170 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 2405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |
