1965 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 984 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | OT | Ranger |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 207 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1664 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3198 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 74 L |