1965 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2010 Nissan Cube is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Cube (122 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Cube weights approximately 588 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 2010 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | OT | Cube |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 122 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1268 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |