1965 Abarth OT vs. 2011 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2011 Nissan Juke is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Juke is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Juke (188 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Juke weights approximately 654 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 2011 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | OT | Juke |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 188 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1334 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |