1965 Abarth OT vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (305 HP) has 241 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 947 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | OT | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 305 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1627 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4778 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1425 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 61 L |
