1965 Abarth OT vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT.
Because 2012 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth OT. (81 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Abarth | Nissan |
| Model | OT | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 137 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Top Speed | 160 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 65 L |
