1965 Abarth OT vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (130 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth OT. (81 Nm). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth OT. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1965 Abarth OT has manual transmission. 1965 Abarth OT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | OT | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 1867 mm |