1965 AC 427 vs. 2005 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac DTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC 427. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC 427 would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 AC 427 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 AC 427 (410 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac DTS. (287 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 AC 427 should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac DTS.
Because 1965 AC 427 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 AC 427. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 AC 427 (652 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac DTS. (388 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1965 AC 427 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac DTS.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC 427 | 2005 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | 427 | DTS |
Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 287 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 652 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2940 mm |