1965 AC Aceca vs. 1958 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1965 AC Aceca is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 AC Aceca (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 389 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 AC Aceca. (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 1958 Jeep CJ | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Aceca | CJ |
Year Released | 1965 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 326 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2060 mm |