1965 AC Aceca vs. 1963 AC Greyhound
To start off, 1965 AC Aceca is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 AC Aceca (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Greyhound weights approximately 224 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 AC Aceca (209 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1965 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 AC Aceca | 1963 AC Greyhound | |
| Make | AC | AC |
| Model | Aceca | Greyhound |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 54 L |
