1965 AC Aceca vs. 1968 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1968 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 AC Aceca (168 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 239 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 AC Aceca (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1965 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 1968 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Aceca | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2060 mm |