1965 AC Aceca vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 AC Aceca weights approximately 96 kg more than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 AC Aceca (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1965 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | AC | Suzuki |
Model | Aceca | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 1940 mm |