1965 AC Aceca vs. 1983 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1159 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 1983 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Aceca | Brougham |
Year Released | 1965 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3090 mm |