1965 AC Aceca vs. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo
To start off, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1965 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo should accelerate faster than 1965 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo weights approximately 679 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 AC Aceca | 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | |
| Make | AC | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Aceca | Proteo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 93.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 72.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4150 mm |
