1965 AC Aceca vs. 1992 Audi 80
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 AC Aceca (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 579 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca.
Because 1965 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 AC Aceca (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1965 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 1992 Audi 80 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | 80 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2309 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1370 kg |