1965 AC Aceca vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 AC Aceca (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Ranger |
Year Released | 1965 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1760 mm |