1965 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Acura NSX
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1965 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1965 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura NSX (304 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 AC Aceca. (209 Nm). This means 2001 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 2001 Acura NSX | |
Make | AC | Acura |
Model | Aceca | NSX |
Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 480 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 304 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |