1965 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Audi R8
To start off, 2002 Audi R8 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 442 more horse power than 1965 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1965 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 AC Aceca weights approximately 789 kg more than 2002 Audi R8.
Because 2002 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 489 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 AC Aceca. (209 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 2002 Audi R8 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | R8 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 610 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 698 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 2 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 66 L |