1965 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1965 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1965 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 665 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 AC Aceca. (209 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 AC Aceca | 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Aceca | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2770 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 252 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 102 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 74 L |
