1965 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2004 Mahindra CL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 AC Aceca (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2004 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2004 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mahindra CL weights approximately 509 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca.
Because 2004 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 AC Aceca (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1965 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 2004 Mahindra CL | |
Make | AC | Mahindra |
Model | Aceca | CL |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2040 mm |