1965 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2004 Pagani Zonda is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 374 more horse power than 1965 AC Aceca. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1965 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 459 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 AC Aceca | 2004 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | AC | Pagani |
| Model | Aceca | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 542 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2730 mm |
