1965 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1965 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1965 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 781 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 AC Aceca. (209 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 2005 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Aceca | Blazer |
Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 4292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1572 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |