1965 AC Aceca vs. 2008 Chrysler Neon
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 474 kg more than 1965 AC Aceca.
Because 1965 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 AC Aceca (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 1965 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 2008 Chrysler Neon | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Aceca | Neon |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4550 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 47 L |