1965 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 AC Aceca (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (113 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Because 1965 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 AC Aceca. (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1965 AC Aceca | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Aceca | 3 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |