1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1964 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 414 kg more than 1964 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1964 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
Model | 2600 | Fulvia |
Year Released | 1965 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 42 L |