1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1968 Jaguar XJ-13
To start off, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 4,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 249 kg more than 1968 Jaguar XJ-13.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 (570 Nm @ 6300 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 2600 | XJ-13 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 4990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1000 mm |