1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1980 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 1980 Mercury Cougar is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 (143 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Cougar. (97 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 184 kg more than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mercury Cougar (218 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1980 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 1980 Mercury Cougar
Make Alfa Romeo Mercury
Model 2600 Cougar
Year Released 1965 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 3271 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 143 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 216 Nm 218 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1146 kg 1330 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 4960 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2690 mm