1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 36 kg more than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | 2600 | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 1182 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2630 mm |
