1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Express is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 187 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Express.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Express (408 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2000 Chevrolet Express | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | 2600 | Express |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 15 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 6210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3940 mm |
