1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 426 kg more than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
| Model | 2600 | F-Type |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2390 mm |
