1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1225 kg more than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Land Rover |
Model | 2600 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2582 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1217 kg | 2442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 100 L |