1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,582 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 429 kg more than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | 2600 | Condor |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2582 cc | 2436 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1217 kg | 1646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 70 L |