1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 (188 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 2600 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 188 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2685 mm |