1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher.
Because 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | Giulia | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
