1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2000 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 604 kg more than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Because 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Sable (248 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm). This means 2000 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia 2000 Mercury Sable
Make Alfa Romeo Mercury
Model Giulia Sable
Year Released 1965 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1570 cc 3001 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 105 HP 0 HP
Torque 133 Nm 248 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1574 kg
Vehicle Length 4130 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 L 68 L