1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2000 Tata E is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia (168 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata E weights approximately 740 kg more than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia (220 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Tata E. (210 Nm). This means 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Tata |
Model | Giulia | E |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 210 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2810 mm |