1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia (168 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Giulia | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2490 mm |