1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (168 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Because 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (220 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia has manual transmission. 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Giulia | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2880 mm |