1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 359 kg more than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia 2009 Mazda CX-9
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model Giulia CX-9
Year Released 1965 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1570 cc 3726 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 105 HP 273 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 133 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.2:1 10.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1329 kg
Vehicle Length 4130 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 L 76 L