1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia (168 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (156 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 850 kg more than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Because 2013 Toyota Matrix is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 220 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 2013 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia has manual transmission. 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia 2013 Toyota Matrix
Make Alfa Romeo Toyota
Model Giulia Matrix
Year Released 1965 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1568 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 7500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 220 Nm
Engine Bore Size 78 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 96 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual 4-speed automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 630 kg 1480 kg
Vehicle Length 3690 mm 4365 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1030 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]