1965 Alpine A 110 vs. 1964 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1965 Alpine A 110 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Zastava 1500 (53 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1965 Alpine A 110. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 1965 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 409 kg more than 1965 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alpine A 110 | 1964 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Alpine | Zastava |
Model | A 110 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2430 mm |