1965 Alpine A 110 vs. 2000 Ascari Ecosse
To start off, 2000 Ascari Ecosse is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 4,722 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ascari Ecosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ascari Ecosse (395 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1965 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 1965 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ascari Ecosse weights approximately 673 kg more than 1965 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alpine A 110 | 2000 Ascari Ecosse | |
Make | Alpine | Ascari |
Model | A 110 | Ecosse |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 4722 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 91.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 88.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1248 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1130 mm |