1965 Alpine A 110 vs. 2000 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Caddy (59 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1965 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1965 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 460 kg more than 1965 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alpine A 110 | 2000 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Alpine | Volkswagen |
Model | A 110 | Caddy |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1850 mm |